Salon.com Technology | Watchdogs slam Google's new e-mail service
Give me a break. If Google had hidden its intentions of scanning your email to help produce relevant ads then that would be something to complain about. The service hasn't even launched yet and the self-serving, self appointed privacy watchdogs are already foaming at the mouth about something Googles been totally upfront about.
Gmail is offering a service that needs to be paid for - targeted ads is how they will pay for it - for you. You don't have to sign up and if you do you certainly don't have to use it for any sensitive correspondence. Grow up people!
Two typically moronic quotes:
The enthusiastic response to Gmail probably is being driven by the chance to get so much e-mail storage space for free, said Chris Hoofnagle, associate director for the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
What a brilliant observation!
"It's not a great deal. Individuals would be throwing away the protections of their communications for a few dollars," Hoofnagle said. "We don't see this as any different than letting a company listen in on your phone conversations and letting the Postal Service open your mail."
Yeah, a free gig of storage supported by ads for products and services I might actually be interested in. What a lousy deal. The only lousy thing here is the absurd analogy.
There is one aspect of the privacy groups concern that may be valid - Google says that "...residual copies of e-mail may remain on our systems, even after you have deleted them from your mailbox or after the termination of your account". Still, hardly reason enough to start comparing Google to "Big Brother" and all the other anti-establishment clichés that are being trotted out. (Soon I imagine we'll hear Gmail described as a "quagmire" - Google's "Vietnam".)